 |
 |

ELLEN
BERG
Diary #16
It's
Time We All Stopped Passing the Buck
"Criticizing the
client is the conventional defense in any embattled profession, and
these stereotypes conveniently relieve us of any responsibility for
our students' problems--or their resolution."
-- The
Courage to Teach, Parker J. Palmer
Palmer's assertion--that
we tend to blame the client when things go wrong--is oh, so true. In fact,
when I brought my concerns up at the MSIP meeting last Monday about the
discrepancy between what we say we are doing at Turner Middle and what we
are actually doing, that is exactly what happened.
"Name one thing
in this document we aren't doing," said my principal. I pointed--easily,
I have to say--to the part that states staff will analyze and use test data
to drive instruction and make decision regarding school programs. "Well,"
she said, "teachers are supposed to be doing that during their team meetings.
Are you saying that's not happening?"
I am thinking,
"Come on. You KNOW that is not happening. Stupid you are not." In a former
life, I probably would have said exactly that, but having matured a bit,
I tried a different tactic.
I told her
that we were given many directives about how to use our time, but that
for a myriad of reasons, many edicts were not actually in practice. "The
problem is that many of us do not have the training or experience to do
many of the things you ask us to do, and, like our students, we simply
avoid the task to keep from looking stupid. We need ongoing training and
support in many of these areas."
She looked
shocked. I think many people go on the offensive when challenged because
most people will back down quickly. Instead, the committee launched into
a productive discussion of how we might be able to put this particular
objective as well as others into practice, since we want the plan to be
a living, truthful document.
United,
we might stand
The most interesting
thing about this experience was that once I spoke up, others chimed in to
support my position. Maybe if we stand up for what is right, others will
find enough strength to stand up as well.
I am continuing
to read The Courage to Teach by Parker J. Palmer, albeit at a snail's
pace. Each page provokes some new understanding that requires some thoughtful
digestion. The quote at the beginning of this entry is just such an example.
As I thought
more about how my superiors pass the buck to abdicate their own responsibilities,
I realized that teachers (myself included) do the same to our students
and their parents.
Everyone
has someone to blame for the low achievement and behaviors of our students.
Are there roadblocks and mitigating factors for particular populations
or individuals? Certainly. But too often we latch on to these influences
as an excuse for failure instead of counterbalancing these influences
with influences of our own. If students can be influenced negatively,
cannot they also be influenced positively?
I understand
that it may be difficult--not impossible--to effect change as a lone teacher,
but if all staff in a building for several years running all preached
and acted in a manner to neutralize the negative factors, couldn't we
make a difference?
Absolutely.
It is human
to seek scapegoats out of fear of our own inadequacy, but remaining there
to avoid responsibility is ridiculous. No one expects us to have all the
answers. If we do not know something, we have the power to learn more.
If one strategy does not work, we can try a different one.
To simply
shrug our shoulders and walk away from our responsibility to try is criminal,
and no amount of analysis of poverty, the media, or lack of parental involvement
can acquit us from our crimes.
Analyzing
my own data
I finally
got the Scholastic Reading Inventory scores from the beginning of the
year this week, and I spent the time to chart students according to the
four categories Scholastic provides: at-risk, basic, proficient, and advanced.
The results explained a lot, especially why many of my sixth graders might
be acting out.
However,
as I examined the seventh and eighth grade results, I noticed the trend
was better scores. I should be happy, right? At the eighth grade level,
only seven students were identified as at-risk as opposed to the double-digits
at the sixth grade. But as I perused the list of students considered proficient,
I only felt shame.
Shame that there
were seven students still on the at-risk level. Shame of remembering their
difficult behavior and my response to it. Shame that I did not recognize
what they needed or how I could help them. The indictment of inadequacy,
inattention, and irritation at their inconvenient behaviors dropping squarely
in my lap.
It's tough to
swallow, because I never wanted them to fail. Unfortunately, because I did
not have the answers, I grabbed on to the most convenient plan of action.
No more.
I promised my
students this year that they would leave as better readers and writers,
and I am committed to that. I am trying to see beyond their behaviors and
to dismiss my natural irritation to help them. I still do not have all the
answers, but I am working harder to find them.
Comment
on this diary entry
Read
next week's diary
Read
last week's diary
|
 |
 |