 |
 |

ELLEN
BERG
Diary #18
The Power of One-on-One:
Three Student Stories
Everyday as
we watch television and movies or listen to the radio, we develop an idea
of what the personalities who entertain us are like. We consider the parts
they play, the gossip we hear about them, and even the way they handle
themselves on awards shows. We love them, hate them or are indifferent
to them, and it is all based on hearsay and inference. In the end, we
do not really know the people behind the stars.
I have a confession
to make: I am a reality TV addict. My husband and I watch every awful reality
show out there, knowing at once how lowbrow it is while simultaneously reveling
in the drama and discontent. We rationalize our viewing by taking solace
in the fact that we know just how awful it all is.
Our latest favorite
is The Surreal Life which assembles a handful of has-been stars in
a Hollywood mansion for fun, frolic and foolishness for roughly two weeks.
Before viewing the show over a period of weeks, my husband and I had very
definite views of many of cast members and what they must be like. Vince
Neil, singer of Motley Crue, would have to be a raucous troublemaker and
drug addict. M.C. Hammer would be trying to relive his glory days, perhaps
bitter that he had lost everything after reaching such heights of stardom.
Brande Roderick, former Playboy model and Baywatch babe, was sure to be
self-absorbed and unkind.
It has been
interesting to watch the cast interact and, in doing so, reveal themselves
to us. M.C. Hammer is a grounded, God-fearing man who told Corey Feldman
that stars have no reason to complain about anything because they have been
overly blessed. Emmanuel Lewis is a truly funny, private person. Vince Neil,
rather than being devil-like, is kind and intelligent. In fact, last week
we saw Vince share how he had lost his faith in God when his daughter passed
away from cancer.
I do not pretend
to know these celebrities, but I think I have a better idea of the person
behind the persona than I did before the series began.
And that is
what I am really trying to get at despite the wordy paragraphs above. For
the most part we view our students from afar like we do our celebrities.
We have snapshots of them from their behavior and the work they complete,
but often we never really know them. We teach to the whole class, making
a few adjustments, but we never really teach each individual in our class.
I am finding
that my greatest successes are in those moments where I begin to know
each student and teach to them alone in the manner and moment they most
need it. Teaching is, or should be, a hugely personal experience.
Teaching
one to one
In past entries
I have touched on using conferences as a means to differentiate for each
child, but a few experiences this week have convinced me we need to go beyond
that. All teachers must take advantage of those sparkling moments that pop
up around us to reach out and teach one to one. It sounds time-consuming,
but if it becomes a standard part of our practice, it takes little time
at all. In fact, I believe it will save us time in the long run.
Let me explain
by sharing
three experiences from this week with you.
The first
is with my homeroom student, "Cassie." Cassie is a student who initially
complained there were no good books in my bookcase, despite a selection
of 500 or more young adult novels. A few months ago I finally connected
her with a book I loved by Sharon Creech, Walk Two Moons. It took
her roughly three weeks to complete it, but as she turned it in she asked
me to recommend another book like it since she had enjoyed it so much.
That recommendation has turned into others, and finally I introduced her
to Speak. Cassie enjoyed the book so much that she emailed me on
a Saturday afternoon to tell me she was almost finished and she could
not wait to talk to me on Monday. She also added that I should think of
another book to set her up with.
This week Cassie
finished a novel I offered her, Zach's Lie, in two days. She is now
enthusiastic about reading, even recommending books to me and her classmates
who are still struggling with finding the right books. Every morning she
stops at my desk to share her newest discoveries, predictions, and ideas
about what she is reading. She has become a Reader.
"Dennis"
is a conundrum, which is a nice way to say he is a real pain in the
behind. Shocking, yes, but we've all had a Dennis in our classrooms. Dennis
constantly draws attention to himself by making fun of others, tapping on
the desk, or making inappropriate comments. He claims he is not doing anything
wrong when corrected and generally refuses to follow directions. He is failing
all classes except band, does very little work, and is often suspended.
This week I
noticed some interesting things about Dennis. First, the Americorps worker
running the talent show emailed me to tell me how well Dennis was working
after school during practice. He shared how Dennis had taken charge of his
group's presentation, offering constructive criticism on performances and
helping to rearrange several parts. He was confident and in control, not
quite the Dennis I knew.
I also noticed
that every time Dennis would be sent back to my room from another class
for time out, he was not a problem at all. He sits down, opens his binder,
and gets to work on the assignment from the other class. If he does not
understand the assignment or needs further work, he waits until I have a
free moment and asks if he can go ask the teacher for assistance. He is
in every respect a model student.
Friday the science
teacher trotted him down to me after her class with a handful of other guilty
parties and told me Dennis had been disruptive and disobedient once again.
I lined all my little people up, had the parent liaison cover my class during
SSR, and had each child call home. In the midst of this process, it suddenly
occurred to me Dennis was not acting out to be bad, he was acting out to
get attention. I asked him to remain with me while we made the final calls,
then I shared my revelations with him. I asked him if he was trying to get
attention. He grinned and said yes, almost shyly.
We talked for
a while, and I told him we had to figure out a way for him to get the attention
he needs in a positive way. His assignment for the weekend is to come up
with a leadership role or task he will be responsible for in the classroom
that will allow him to get some positive attention. We returned to class,
he settled down to read, and for the first time in four months I did not
hear a peep from Dennis. He was focused on his book.
"Felicity"
is a loud in-your-face kind of girl. She is below grade level, and she
often masks her frustration with off-task behaviors. She is also funny and
wants the approval of her teachers. When she returned from suspension this
week, I sat down with her to discuss what she had missed. I showed her how
to categorize her research on electricity in preparation for her article
and asked her if she had any questions. She clarified a few points then
set about completing the task. Later she called me over to ask if she could
use the remaining time to firm up one category of her research because as
she put it, "I played too much before, and my article won't sound right
if I don't get this information." She worked steadily for the rest of the
period, no interruptions, no outbursts, just a focus on her work.
Students
are more than their roles
All three
of the students I have described could be and have been
given labels, stereotyped like we do celebrities. Cassie would be the
reluctant reader, Dennis the troublemaker, and Felicity the dummy. Many
of us, myself included, stay at the surface level and assume our students
intend to portray that role. We too often expect students to be more self-aware
than we ourselves are, and we forget they they also fall into patterns
and roles they feel trapped in. We feel rushed, irritated, and personally
insulted when students do not fit the role we most desire, that of eager
student, and we overlook the person behind the mask.
It is a simple
but profound concept: to teach our students most effectively we must know
them. When we begin to know them we learn what works for them and how we
need to adjust our instruction. The nature of our relationship changes from
adult to trusted advisor when we show students we think they are important
enough to know and understand.
Comment
on this diary entry
Read
next week's diary
Read
last week's diary
|
 |
 |